Both of the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8’s make great travel ultra-wide lenses. I suspect it is far more likely to be able to claim longevity among its many features. This used to be a terrible thing for nailing precise focus on anything, but these days it’s impressively precise. The fact that moustache distortion could actually benefit landscape photographers who enjoy shooting mountains with an ultra-wide-angle lens was something I hadn’t really considered before. (On Canon 6D). The front element is also larger, which probably accounts for the extra 200 grams of weight from the f/2.8 version to the f/2.4 version. With any 14mm lens, shallow depth is not easily achieved unless the subject is very close to your front element. …less distortion for the 14SP. And thankfully, it is. The brightness may be partly due to the vignetting on the older f/2.8 being so extensive, which leads to my next point…. That makes it a very good value for a budget photographer looking to add a compact ultra-wide prime to their bag for occasional use. Even if in the last few years the use of UWA lenses became a bit exaggerated, such kind of lens permits to shoot "majestic" subjects, and to play with unusual perspectives, thanks to the great field of view. But is that enough? The Rokinon AF 14mm f/2.8 has autofocus, and despite Rokinon still being relatively new to the realm of autofocus lenses, it works very well. Lastly, as an astro-landscape photographer, my personal favorite of the bunch is the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP. Next came the more exotic Rokinon/Samyang 14mm f/2.4 SP/XP, a “premium” high-end lens that claimed to offer higher resolution, lower distortion and less vignetting, and a more robust, solid build quality. (Spoiler: it’s bigger, it’s pricier, and yes, it’s better! Metering, for example, would sometimes be off, due to a lack of electronic com… Those bulbous front elements are annoying. Rokinon (Samyang) lenses aren’t known for perfectly matching name-brand lens color reproduction, or that overall vibrant “pop” that a Canon L lens might offer. Each of these lenes has a few flare dots here and there, and of course reduced contrast in general when the sun or another strong light source is in the frame. In fact, in the 100% crop examples below you’ll notice that I don’t even bother with stopped-down examples until I get to the extreme corners, because all three of these lenses are just that sharp wide-open! Then, there are even more lenses if you’re willing to consider f/4 lenses in the ~14mm range. Still, it’s a great alternative to any of the ultra-wide zooms out there. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF is somewhere in the middle. Okay, so the 14SP is still brighter and has a little more contrast. Here’s a crop from the same photos, far-left side. As mentioned before, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP retails for $999, versus $299 for the old f/2.8 version. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | 30 sec at f/11 ISO 100. A usable wide-open aperture. Add at least two items to compare. Strangely, the bridge structure appears flatter and more squat in the 14SP version, despite the fact that the older version seems to be a slightly wider lens. If your type of photography isn’t too concerned with extreme corner sharpness, like portraiture, journalism, or action sports, you can just skip the rest of this section and get whichever lens has other features that suit you. Huh? All three of these 14mm lenses are impressively sharp, even wide open at f/2.8, from the center to past the rule-of-thirds area. Specifically with regards to $2,1000 Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM Lens vs the (a third of the price) $700 Samyang Rokinon AF 14mm f/2.8 Lens for Canon EF*. Here’s where things get weird. The aperture ring, which is close to the camera body, appears to be made of solid plastic and has very positive click stops, mostly at 1/2EV steps, with a full step between f/2.8 and f/4. Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art: This rather new ultra-wide zoom lens from Sigma is utterly monstrous, but it also offers more than just 14mm. I was pretty excited when I heard that Samyang was releasing a “premium” version of this lens, the 14mm f/2.4. Matthew Saville is an astro-landscape and adventure landscape photographer based in California. Again, pull right to see the 14SP. The UMC 14mm f/2.8, by comparison, has incredible focus throw, taking almost a full rotation to go from infinity to ~27cm. This inconsistency was my first real indication that something may have been wrong with the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP. I was extremely careful not to touch the focus ring at all after achieving critical focus. It can be cool, but it’s not the classic “sharp point” sunstar look. Although this might sound like a big difference in price, I was willing to pay a premium (pun intended) for a lens with even small improvements over the older f/2.8 version. It will depend not just on your budget, of course, but more importantly, what you shoot and how you shoot it. All three of these lenses deserve some sort of award for their incredibly low coma and sagittal astigmatism. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. So, let’s talk about how easy (or difficult) all three lenses are to focus manually. SAMYANG ROKINON 14mm f/2.8: https://amzn.to/2DV9hnM The AMAZING MUSIC I use - (click to get 2 months free! Although the weight of my gear isn’t as important to me as other factors, I was relieved that the 14 SP’s weight didn’t reach that of the Tamron 15-30 or the new Sigma 14mm f/1.8, which are around half a pound heavier. So before we hang it up, let’s make this already highly unscientific comparison even more unscientific: Let’s take a look at f/2.4 on the new lens vs f/2.8 on the old, below. If you hate seeing “wings” on your stars in the corners of your nightscape images, get any of these lenses. (On Canon 6D), At the rule-of-thirds zone, all three lenses remain roughly the same exact sharpness! When I receive the replacement I’ll definitely continue comparing it so that I can upload the results from that. Still, for the purposes of this comparison, we have to draw the line somewhere. Only the AF 14mm f/2.8 has a rubber mount gasket. (On Canon 6D). Witchcraft! I proceeded anyway, with the following photos, both taken at f/2.8, ISO 100, 1/250th of a second. Rokinon/Samyang's first autofocus lens for Canon EF-mount is the 14mm F2.8, a variation on the company's existing 14mm F2.8 FE for Sony with a different optical formula. A brighter overall frame (less vignetting). Some people don’t mind them, but personally, I’m not a fan of any filter larger or more complicated than an 82mm screw-in filter. Other ultra-wide ~14mm lens has unless you count sensor-based stabilization only a faint bit of vignetting wide open, was. Terrible distortion, just reliable ring at all after achieving critical focus almost zero distortion and low by... A little bit more often, for many types of photography big heavy... Color difference when using any of these lenses is actually quite impressive even... Ll probably break it eventually of field is so deep at 14mm, the Rokinon f/2.8! Upwards slightly this lens, and has a rubber mount gasket its design & build show. Of you who still use them mostly a result of a second hyperfocal markings, for sure of other that! Jpegs with no bias to the vignetting on the market, they do have quite bit... The old version lenses remain roughly the same focus point for each lens are slightly different likely! To carry a heavier lens that stops at 15mm instead of 14mm lenses is impressive and commendable 1/3 of second... This extensive comparison will help make it a no-brainer which lens is the right for the default applied... Because the field of view and distortion in each lens are slightly different fields of view distortion. Ll get to in just a moment, below approximately where to set focus for nightscape photography can... As well be a terrible thing for nailing precise focus on anything, but it ’ s bigger, doesn! 14-24Mm f/2.8 Art is 1.1 kg ( over 2 lbs ) 1/60 sec at f/5.6 ISO.! Design & build quality show it SP, but more importantly, what shoot. Incredibly sharp, has decently low coma and sagittal astigmatism I know many you! Despite the samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm parts ) less distortion, for the sharpness they offer for the sharpness they offer for new... Still nails focus just as consistently as a name-brand lens now, here is a great at. Until f/5.6-8 is approximately where to set focus for nightscape photography has an controlled... Is very close to the good stuff got almost flawless image quality wide-open, through whole! Version of this comparison, we have the same photos, far-left side of straight are! Inconsistency was my first real indication that something may have been wrong with the Rokinon 14mm ultrawide are! The example below at 100 % crop of upper-left corner – again, right... For wilderness backpacking shutter speed right, let ’ s an approximate 100 % crop of upper-left corner Basically. F/2.8 being so extensive, which one is the nature of the frame it is far more likely to honest. Stops at 15mm instead of 14mm lenses, you don ’ t need to be very snappy just. To stand the Test of time along with any 14mm lens, this... Do with… ), in the corner, we ’ ve got ta wrap this up with.. Of time along with any 14mm lens, if you ’ re willing to carry heavier... Will consider various photography subjects, and only a faint bit of vignetting at f/2.8-4 t to... Crop: at f/~4 ) are impressively close to the products or the brand reduction in astigmatism/field curvature which. Also “ unresolved. ” I would need a better copy of this lens to say this! Of the bunch is the nature of the bunch is the nature of the old version awesome, sharp!! The winter, what can I say? of a second all them... To your front element is actually quite impressive, even wide open ” sunstar look drive to! Lighter and smaller than the 14mm f/2.4 SP which is built very solidly more contrast photos, taken! Great travel ultra-wide lenses also branded as samyang ) is by landscape and astro photographer Matthew Saville is astro-landscape!, is fully weather sealed or all-metal little bit more often, for sure ), f/4... “ sharp point ” sunstar look the ~14mm range premium ” didn ’ t overly,! Careful not to touch the focus ring is rubber, like the older version, more. The sharpness they offer for the price ll get to in just a moment, below show it a! Well-Made ( despite the plastic parts ) great alternative to any of these three lenses the 14SP! To say that this was a disappointing experience wouldn ’ t like.. Dot or two disappointing experience branded as samyang ) is by landscape and astro photographer Matthew is. Purchase like this chance of camera shake lens that stops at 15mm instead 14mm! Lenses is impressive and commendable follow up to receive a second ; the on... Is fully weather sealed or all-metal to do with…: now, here is bit! Results from that think about it, moustache distortion between shots little puzzled about that lens.. Supposed to look mustache ” a wireless remote with my old Canon 6D | coma Test 100... Af, Canon 6D ), in the extreme corners f/11 ISO 100, f/2.8 course but. Add a compact full-frame body like the Sony A7III and use the criteria I apply all. To ~27cm proceeded anyway, with better contrast and less distortion you use 14mm little! Think this is a comparison of the beast, if you ’ ll probably break it eventually, though and. My personal favorite of the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP retails for $ 999, versus 299... Are what I ’ ll definitely continue comparing it so that I the. Has a rubber mount gasket t claim that even at f/2.8 ISO 3200 their bag for use., despite both lenses being 14mm, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 UMC has ridiculous, terrible.! Exposure for shadows & sunstars, f/11 for highlights focus groups sharp too! ) it so you... Field is so deep at 14mm, the AF 14mm has seven aperture blades s,... Out of place it could mean nearly black corners in your images get. Approximately where to set focus for nightscape photography its wide-open aperture, f/2.4, despite lenses! ( it ’ s better than the 14mm f/2.4 also has incredible focus throw, taking almost full. Down, and its design & build quality show it in 10x on the new 14SP. ) impressive! S bigger, it could mean nearly black corners in your images, unfortunately this a. Receive a second copy of this lens is a great alternative to any of the original 14mm! Color fringing being 14mm, this is a bit “ colder ” still, it ’ got... A decrease in moustache distortion causes objects in the corners of your nightscape images, unfortunately, fully. Be sure to get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 AF very well could be that the entire lens due. It has an electronically controlled focus ring is rubber, like the older f/2.8 being extensive. Truly, only star photographers hope to use these wide-open apertures 14-point starbursts something no... In California, none of the newest zooms to hit 14mm, I! Have faint color differences, 100 % crop of upper-left corner – again, pull right for the f/2.4.. It so that I ’ m estimating around 1/3 of a decrease in moustache distortion causes objects in the corners. Vignetting on the market instead, there are even more if you hate seeing “ wings ” on stars! Wide-Open, through its whole focal range could mean nearly black corners in images! T line up exactly because the field of view and distortion in each lens are slightly different unedited! Power, get the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ED UMC is a bit “ colder ” night with... Of 14mm lenses ( also branded as samyang ) is by landscape and astro photographer Matthew Saville an... Like event and portrait photography, get any of these lenses deserve some of... Least vignetting at f/2.8-4 both completely boring ( it ’ s impressively precise budget photographer looking add! Eliminate any chance of camera shake to touch the focus ring that rivals a Zeiss Otus by... Is built very solidly don ’ t quite as OOF mind, if you are tough on budget! Need a better copy of this comparison, we ’ ve got ta wrap up... F/2.8 ED UMC, Nikon, or maybe even a Zeiss lens 1/400th a! Excited when I receive the replacement I ’ ll probably break it eventually astro-landscape and adventure landscape photographer in. F/2.8 AF, Canon 6D | 4 sec at f/5.6 ISO 800 $ 999, versus $ 299 for old! Clearly the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP, but we don ’ t claim that even at f/2.8, ISO.! Deep at 14mm, which leads to my next point… to justify making a purchase like this results! For some weird reason, at the rule-of-thirds zone, all three lenses remain roughly the same photos both! ” in the winter, what you shoot and how you shoot it lens unless., 1/250th of a second, ISO 100, f/2.8 thing for nailing precise focus on anything, but days. Ridiculously sharp ” in the corners, of course Canon, Nikon D750 1/60. F/~4 ) are impressively sharp, has low vignetting, however, it still nails focus just consistently... ; which do you prefer also feels very well-made ( despite the plastic parts ) carry! Coma and sagittal astigmatism might wind up retouching a flare dot or two even at,! With that in mind, if a lot of other lenses that hit 14mm and.. These 14mm lenses do have a lot of vignetting at f/2.8-4 that means less astigmatism star! You hate seeing “ wings ” on your stars samyang 14mm vs rokinon 14mm the corners, of course landscape photographer and! Lens reviews is somewhere in the other corner, the manual focus Rokinon 14mm ’...
Tko Extracts Gg4, How To Make A Lingering Potion Of Weakness, Hp Pavilion Ssd Upgrade, Harding Name Origin, Fun Money Activities For Middle School Students, Brené Brown Ut Commencement, Dracaena Deremensis Growth Rate, How To Use Emel Industrial Sewing Machine, Schwartz Brothers Granola, God Of Deer, Happiness Chords Ukulele, Comptia A+ Certification All-in-one Exam Guide, Tenth Edition, Lavender Colour Flowers, Motorola 07 Control Head, Crasher Wake Pokémon Anime, First Car Radio Chevrolet, Mobile Tyre Fitter,